/cdn.vox-cdn.com/photo_images/5679750/20120225_maw_aq3_105.jpg)
You spent the better part of four months meticulously dissecting the 2012 college lacrosse season. You shouldn't stop now because cold turkey is a bad way to go through life, man. College Crosse is providing decompression snapshots of all 61 teams and their 2012 campaigns, mostly because everything needs a proper burial.
I. VITAL SIGNS
Team: Georgetown Hoyas
2012 Record: 7-6 (3-3, Big East)
2012 Strength of Schedule (Efficiency Margin): 1.06 (22)
2011 Strength of Schedule (Efficiency Margin): 1.69 (14)
Winning Percentage Change from 2011: -4.49%
2012 Efficiency Margin: -1.10 (34)
Efficiency Margin Change from 2011: -4.11
II. "ATTA BOY!" FACT
- Despite a middling record that featured far too many suspect outcomes, Georgetown remained ferociously tenacious for much of the season. The Hoyas were militant on their ride, holding opponents to only a 80.00 percent clearing rate (good for fifth nationally). This ability to steal their opponents' lunch helped the team pull together the seventh-best turnovers-per-defensive-possession mark in the country. (Incidentally, the team's caused turnover rate wasn't solely attributable to the Hoyas' riding ability. This is a defense that yielded the fourth-fewest shots per defensive possession and a big reason for that is because guys like Chris Nourse did a good job at generating turnovers.) The end result? A bad offense was given some extra opportunities to try and actually can the bean (a rare feat on a per-possession basis for the Hoyas). Riding and generating turnovers, if within the defensive strategy, are driven in large part by hustle and effort; the Hoyas could have folded this year but still put in good work.
III. "YOU'RE GROUNDED UNTIL YOU QUALIFY FOR THE AARP!" FACT
- Georgetown's offense should have been shot in the skull halfway through the 2012 campaign. This was, without a doubt, one of the worst offensive teams in the country: The Hoyas struggled to share the ball (ranked only 51st in offensive assist rate); they shot the ball like a drunk guy on a golf cart while eating a hot dog (ranked only 45th in raw offensive shooting percentage); and the team turned the ball over on about 48 percent of their offensive opportunities. The result was an adjusted offensive efficiency value ranked 50th in the nation, just a year removed from a season in which the offense placed 18th in the same metric. While the team's man-up conversion rate was pretty solid (40.43 percent), it ultimately didn't matter as the Hoyas rarely actually played with the personnel imbalance in their favor (the team ranked 43rd in extra-man opportunity per offensive opportunity). So, the team's man-up ability was muted because the offense -- in the overall -- was a tire fire lit with a nuclear bomb.
IV. MR. FIX-IT HAS A ONE-FIX ENGAGEMENT, AND IT'S . . .
- These two tweets from the Washington Times' Patrick Stevens just about say it all about Georgetown for next year and beyond:
Worth noting about Georgetown lacrosse's short-term future --- starts by class in 2012: Seniors 42, Juniors 88, Sophomores 0, Freshmen 0
— Patrick Stevens (@D1scourse) July 13, 2012
Whoever gets that job inherits a senior-heavy team that could surprise in 2013. Lots of unproven players at the college level beyond that.
— Patrick Stevens (@D1scourse) July 13, 2012