The Scheduling Crunch


The Division III scheduling experience has all kinds of parallels to Division I lacrosse.

The best work of lacrosse writing this season may belong to Lacrosse Magazine and Jac Coyne. In a monster piece that takes a deep and detailed look into the scheduling situation that many Division III programs face, Coyne does a tremendous job at illustrating an aspect of college lacrosse that many overlook or don't understand: Agenda creation. Coyne's piece focuses on six themes that Division III programs must deal with when composing a slate:
  • The desire -- and need -- to put quality competition on the nonconference portion of a team's agenda.
  • The issues that conferences -- both pressure/control from conferences and the reality of fixed dates for league games -- create with respect to schedule constitution in totem.
  • Budget restrictions that often impede the ability to travel to quality competition.
  • Academic calendar restrictions that limit a program's ability to compose a schedule.
  • Relationship restrictions and limitations -- both between athletic departments and coaches -- that drive a team's ability to finalize a desired slate.
  • Agreement issues between programs that maintain uncertain futures and malleable lengths.

While Coyne's piece concentrates on Division III lacrosse, the Division I parallels are clear: Scheduling issues don't exist in a vacuum. There are flashpoints of this all over college lacrosse's highest level of play:

  • Syracuse won't play Princeton this season for the first time in 15 years. This is, in all likelihood, a residue of conference realignment.
  • Johns Hopkins is going to have a completely different agenda in 2015 due to its participation in the Big Ten's lacrosse concern, a move that was made to provide the program with an NCAA Tournament safety net should an at-large invitation look bleak. Many traditional names may be missing from the Blue Jays' schedule next season.
  • Marquette didn't play any intersquad fall games this past autumn due to budget concerns and will only play five home dates -- four against Big East competition -- this coming spring.

And it goes on and on and on. Scheduling is a variable that creates all kinds of complications and consequences, situations that fans must simply accept. These agenda-setting obstacles are a struggle to overcome, and with the paradigm remaining volatile, the only consistency inherent in the condition is that it will remain notably absent: The continued growth of conferences, made-for-television games, postseason-driven dates, and a host of other concerns will not only promote the scheduling crunch but arguably heighten it. This is a complex issue, and fans will need to be flexible with respect to its ramifications.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join College Crosse

You must be a member of College Crosse to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at College Crosse. You should read them.

Join College Crosse

You must be a member of College Crosse to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at College Crosse. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.