Eulogizing the 2012 College Lacrosse Season: (2) Loyola

FOXBORO, MA - MAY 28: Loyola Greyhound fans (L toR)Tara Kneafsey, Rachal Degnan and Sophia Marion wait for the start of the 2012 NCAA Division I Men's Lacrosse Championship game between Loyola and the Maryland Terripans at Gillette Stadium on May 28, 2012 in Foxboro, Massachusetts. (Photo by Winslow Townson/Getty Images)

You spent the better part of four months meticulously dissecting the 2012 college lacrosse season. You shouldn't stop now because cold turkey is a bad way to go through life, man. College Crosse is providing decompression snapshots of all 61 teams and their 2012 campaigns, mostly because everything needs a proper burial.


Team: Loyola Greyhounds

2012 Record: 18-1 (6-0, ECAC)

2012 Strength of Schedule (Efficiency Margin): 0.51 (27)

2011 Strength of Schedule (Efficiency Margin): 2.07 (9)

Winning Percentage Change from 2011: +33.20%

2012 Efficiency Margin: 11.80 (2)

Efficiency Margin Change from 2011: +11.55


  • Well, first, Loyola won the national championship in 2012. That probably deserves a pat on the back and a Certificate of Merit. (No doink.) Other than that, though, what really impressed me about the Greyhounds -- other than an 18-1 record (the lone loss coming in a heartbreaker against Johns Hopkins in overtime) -- was that Charley Toomey and his staff got the entire program to buy in and get all of the little things done: Nobody caused more turnovers per defensive possession than the Greyhounds; nobody cleared the ball as well as Loyola did last season, maximizing their opportunities to potentially can the bean; only one team -- Hopkins -- turned the ball over less than Loyola; only six teams took fewer penalties per possession than the 'Hounds (and only 10 teams played in man-down less than Loyola on a per-possession basis); the Greyhounds clicked on extra-man opportunities (even though Loyola rarely played in these postures on a per-possession basis), finishing 44.44 percent of their attempts (a mark that placed the club eighth-nationally in the metric); and, in part due to J.P. Dalton's man-work at the dot, finished the season +3.51 in possession margin (the eighth best mark in Division I). It's not fashioning a rocket out of cream cheese and coupons from the local deli; it's lacrosse, and when you do all the little things that limit your opponents from preferential success opportunities and maximize yours, the sun -- in general -- is going to shine on your face and stuff.


  • You can't really knock an 18-1 effort that ends with a national title (earned over Championship Weekend in dominate fashion). (I guess you can, but that'd make you a huge jerk that deserves a face-punch and a wedgie.) Although, if I did have to scrounge around for something that looks icky, it'd be this: With Sawyer, Lusby, Ward, and Associates, Inc., I kind of expected the 'Hounds to shoot a little better than they did last season. On the year, Loyola shot -- in the aggregate -- at a raw 29.93 percent (that rate was good for 22nd in the country). That isn't necessarily bad, but when viewed in this context -- only 15 teams saw their opponents make more saves per possession than Loyola's enemies -- it is a little odd that the Greyhounds had some mild issues with accuracy and burning the ball past opposing keepers. (Again, that isn't to say that Loyola ran with an impotent offense; the 'Hounds did run with a top-10 offense in terms of adjusted efficiency.) It's just this: With the kind of weapons that were on the field, I expected indicia of accuracy to be higher. That's all. (I anxiously await your emails full of hurt feelings.)


  • The fix isn't a fix at all: Don't screw it up in 2013. The Greyhounds return as much production and contribution as any team in the country and, I am to assume, will likely show up in everybody's top-three come preseason polling time. That doesn't guarantee that Loyola is going to run at another title, though: Since 1971, only four programs -- Syracuse (1988-1990; 2008-2009); Johns Hopkins (1978-1980; 1984-1985); Princeton (1996-1998); and Cornell (1976-1977) -- have turned the trick as repeating as champions. Toomey needs to focus on letting his players let 2012 receded into the abyss and treat 2013 as a new challenge with familiar faces. It's all there for the 'Hounds to grab again next season; it's just a matter of whether Loyola can attack this all anew.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join College Crosse

You must be a member of College Crosse to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at College Crosse. You should read them.

Join College Crosse

You must be a member of College Crosse to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at College Crosse. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.