Would love to see an unbiased comparison between Cornell's Rob Pannell and Virginia's Steele Stanwick. We all know who I'm rooting for here, but unfortunately, I don't get a vote.
Pannell hands down had the better regular season, and his numbers really can't be ignored. But Stanwick has been dominant in the postseason and you can't say he had a bad regular season by any stretch of the imagination. This postseason play has also been with him coming off a 6-week period where he was limited during practice, or not available to practice at all due to injuries. Is that a factor?
There's also the factor that Virginia is still playing, and Cornell is not. Making the championship game is one thing -- what happens if Virginia goes against all (most?) odds and actually pulls it off on Monday?
This is assuming that you all agree with me that it's really just down to between Pannell and Stanwick.